It’s a Dance link
Was happily excited this morning to see that Glen Reynolds of Instapundit has mentioned my book. Not a big mention, mind you, but I really, really appreciate the note.
He noted a couple of things. One that the cover letter made reference to his book, An Army of Davids, and the second that the book is about the topic of the Holy Spirit in a pub.
Of course, as friendly emaily Todd let me know, this wee bit of attention came when the book site happened to be down. I’m taking care of that right now and in the meantime have forwarded links to my personal site here. While that site has a bit more info, I want to include a bit more here, for those who are new to It’s a Dance.
Glen’s book, and his efforts online, have emphasized how an “army of Davids” can bring radical change to all kinds of fields. This is no less true for religion, and my book touches on two very important aspects of this in Christianity. The first is the topic of the book itself: the Holy Spirit. What Glen Reynolds has emphasized as the many banding together to bring challenge and renewal to human systems is an inherent part of Christian theology. That is the work, we say, of the Holy Spirit. However, discussions of the Holy Spirit have consistently been relegated to the back of the theological line. Reasons for this are many but one big one is that a thorough theology of the Holy Spirit undermines hierarchical patterns and empowers all Christians to take a vital role in shaping both local and global Christianity. In pushing for a renewed examination of the Holy Spirit theologians and ministers are opening the door for what can really be called ‘open source’ Christianity. Those interested in how this affects broader culture might find chapter five especially interesting as it deals with a critique of the religious right and how a thorough understanding of the Spirit leads Christians towards different expression of public interaction and personal understanding.
The other aspect is the particular form of church that I have chosen to highlight in my book. Called the ‘emerging church’ it is a renewal movement that has taken off in the last ten years. There is a de-emphasis of buildings and structure and settled form emphasizing instead characteristics that seek to best reflect the mission of Jesus in bringing hope and renewal. The leaders of this movement have utilized technology in all its forms from the beginning, with blogs, podcasts, and other internet tools helping to bring many from around the world into a shared conversation. It is, in effect, the Christian expression of what Glen has emphasized in other fields.
This is a source for both the setting and the approach. While it is a theology book, it’s not a dry one. Rather, it’s a conversation set up between a reporter, a pastor, and some others, taking place in a pub. Essentially, as I was writing it I had my own questions and objections that came to mind. Instead of ignoring these I made them part of the whole. And thus made it an open, and hopefully continuing, conversation.
Thanks for having a look at it. And thanks again to Instapundit for highlighting it.
Signs of Life
A couple weeks ago I had the chance to preach on the topics in my book It’s a Dance: Moving with the Holy Spirit. It wasn’t recorded, as far as I know. However, this morning I sat outside and got it on video. It’s about 27 minutes long.
ups and downs
I’ve not posted a lot of late. And I’m not sure why. Seems like sometimes my thoughts introvert, hide away and stew a bit. Or they privatize, wandering about while mildly put off by exposure. Or they rest, not really all that stimulated by the usual topics. Or they wait, as life enters into a mild vacation of sorts for a brief time until all manner of activity explodes. Or they are reduced by a Spring cold, blocked by mild headache, sore throat, and congestion for a little over a week.
Sometimes all of these at once. Which is the season I’m in now.
Last Monday I got home from a ten day trip to the Portland area. I know a number of people from that part of the world, oddly enough, but that wasn’t my reason for going. My reasons were much more narrow. And happy. Very happy as it turned out.
Went up to visit Amy, to see if there was a spark.

There was. Quite a spark. By the end of the week the spark ignited. We’re working out what it means to be so close so far away. I suspect for the time being it means a developing familiarity with airports.
Needless to say my mind wasn’t quite on the usual topics that have kept me occupied round these parts.
While up there I also had a chance to preach, something I’ve not done for a long while. A long, long while. Amy’s pastor was taking time off and I spoke on my book. I think it was a very good experience and had a good reception. I struggle at times because my book sales are still rather a lot low without any particular reason I can figure out, a frustration to be sure and one that I have to continually put into God’s hands. Yet, moments like those become encouragements, helping me to see again why I wrote what I did and helping me to see there is a need for more reaching out. I don’t know if it was recorded or not. If not then I’m going to re-record it and then also post the text.
A lot of my life is in flux right now. I don’t know where I’ll be living this summer or this fall. I might move down to Pasadena to be closer to Fuller–I’d like to–but other considerations abound. I might take summer school–French or German–though I might just try to be diligent in self study so as to test out of my language requirements. I am trying to finish another book before all the school stuff starts, though I’m mixed in motivation. My present sales heartily discourage, the whole effect of writing on my heart and soul encourage.
I stumble and lose faith and hope. I doubt that good things will remain good. I hope that God is working. I trust that he will lead to where he wants me to be. I pray he will continue to teach and develop and hone. Doubts abound but so do hopes. I hope to hold onto that hope, to see where it might lead.
I smile and I wonder and I laugh and I ponder and I fear and I dream. I want to say so much, yet wonder who is listening. I want to stay silent, yet wonder if I should speak. I want to dance and also hide in the corner at the same time. Good and wonderful things are developing. But the ship has not yet reached port.
So I’ll just keep my wits about me and pray for fair winds.
Off and Away to an emerging pneumatology
I’m leaving on a jet plane, be back late Sunday evening.
Going to the Society of Pentecostal Studies annual conference, out in North Carolina–at Duke to be more exact.
Should be a grand time. I’m giving a little presentation on emerging pneumatology, in which I take the traits of the emerging church and view them through the lens of Moltmann’s theology to identify these traits as an emerging pneumatology.
In other words, the same thing I did with my book.
This morning I practiced and recorded it. I need more practice, and I need to get over this cold and cough, but for the most part I’m happy with what I’ve done. The book is 270 pages. The paper I wrote for the conference is 27 pages. The text of the presentation I will be giving on that paper is 13 pages. Editing down is fun!
Here’s the 1/2 hour presentation.
Or you can visit me on youtube.
If there is good access I’m going to try to do regular posts from the conference, and maybe get some video. We’ll see.
Cheers!
a reading of It’s a Dance: Moving with the Holy Spirit
I’m trying something out. Or practicing at least. I got a new webcam and I thought it would be interesting to do a reading of my book. Here’s the first installment, the beginning of chapter 2.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UenC-nuBp6U&rel=1">
the standard of our faith
I got into a little conversation over at Shoutlife with a very sharp man named Aaron. I think we’re talking past each other in some cases, but the core issue is the place of the Law in Christianity. He has been very influenced by a Jewish Rabbi, who enlightened him to see the reality of Jewish foundations of Christianity. Yet, I sense he’s pushing too far.
He asked if there is no adherence to the Law, then what is the standard by which we know we are serving God?
I answered. And it took enough writing time for me to want to post it here as well:
What is the standard? How are we to know the fruit? What is the measurement of the Law? The Mosaic law spelled this out in detail. And gives a very good marker of wrong and right, a very orderly way of determining where we stand. Hence Paul could say, “If anyone else has reason to be confident in the flesh, I have more: circumcised on the eighth day, a member of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew born of Hebrews; as to the law, a Pharisee; as to zeal, a persecutor of the church; as to righteousness under the law, blameless.”
Yet, he doesn’t stop there. He’s not just suggesting a renewed emphasis on the Law. He goes a step further, which involves him letting go what he once saw as his identity.
“Yet whatever gains I had, these I have come to regard as loss because of Christ. More than that, I regard everything as loss because of the surpassing value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things, and I regard them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ and be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but one that comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God based on faith. I want to know Christ and the power of his resurrection and the sharing of his sufferings by becoming like him in his death, if somehow I may attain the resurrection from the dead.”
All he had before he considers loss, rubbish even, letting go the identity of righteousness that comes from the law, and instead embracing Christ. How do we know the markers of this embrace? He tells us that it is the same way we know that Abraham was a follower of God. He had faith. He followed God. Same way as Noah. He had faith. He followed God. The fruit is that of the Spirit which is “love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.” Paul continues in Galatians 5 “There is no law against such things. And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. If we live by the Spirit, let us also be guided by the Spirit.”
If we live by the Spirit, the very mark of a true follower of Jesus, then we must be guided by the Spirit. It is the Spirit who is to be our counselor now, our guide, our standard, our marker, our leader, our discernment. And through the Spirit we can know the mind of God.
This is not contra to the Hebrew Scriptures at all. The Spirit shows up all throughout, coming upon men and women, prophets and kings and the occasional artist. I think of Oholiab and Bezalel in Exodus 31. The Law told the specifications of the Tabernacle. These two guys were filled with the Holy Spirit to bring it all together, to know in their very being what was commanded and go beyond it. They, themselves, were the bearers of God’s creative plan, so they taught and they made.
And that is what the Spirit does still. The Spirit comes upon all those who call upon Yeshua. The Spirit opens hearts and minds and souls, filling each man and woman with wondrous gifts to enter into a living relationship with God, a relationship that the Law hints at but doesn’t fully fulfill.
Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit of life set me free from the law of sin and death. For what the law was powerless to do in that it was weakened by the sinful nature, God did by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful man to be a sin offering. And so he condemned sin in sinful man, in order that the righteous requirements of the law might be fully met in us, who do not live according to the sinful nature but according to the Spirit.
Those who live according to the sinful nature have their minds set on what that nature desires; but those who live in accordance with the Spirit have their minds set on what the Spirit desires. The mind of sinful man is death, but the mind controlled by the Spirit is life and peace; the sinful mind is hostile to God. It does not submit to God’s law, nor can it do so. Those controlled by the sinful nature cannot please God.
You, however, are controlled not by the sinful nature but by the Spirit, if the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Christ. But if Christ is in you, your body is dead because of sin, yet your spirit is alive because of righteousness. And if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead is living in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit, who lives in you.
Therefore, brothers, we have an obligation?but it is not to the sinful nature, to live according to it. For if you live according to the sinful nature, you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will live, because those who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God. For you did not receive a spirit that makes you a slave again to fear, but you received the Spirit of sonship. And by him we cry, “Abba, Father.” The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God’s children. Now if we are children, then we are heirs?heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory.
Our obligation is to the Spirit. That is the standard.
Now, don’t interpret me like you are probably rightly interpreting many folks who are unfamiliar with the Jewish backgrounds. I think those who know the Law know God in an extraordinary way. The Law speaks of God in an elegant fashion. Inasmuch as the Church pushed out the Jewish understanding of Messiah and God it lost its way, something we see in obvious and hidden ways throughout history, and still in our churches. However, that being said the specific instructions now lie in terms of following the Spirit, which allows for a flexibility and relationship beyond what was possible before. It’s not a matter of parsing the details of what was given to Moses. It’s a matter of living like Abraham in our contexts, or Noah, or Joseph. The New Adam has given us a new relationship with God in freedom.
And the Holy Spirit came upon the early Church, telling Peter, for instance, in a dream to kill and eat for all that God made was clean. To accept Cornelius as a Gentile, for God himself had made him clean not through the law, but by pouring upon him the Holy Spirit.
I know this is an elusive answer. But I guess I see defining a relationship as an elusive reality that is both stricter and more flexible than, say, a master and servant relationship.
So there is a standard. But it’s not codified, as the Spirit is not codified. Certainly there is overlap, and for those who want to have a very established standard there is nothing wrong with following the whole Torah. However, those who fully follow the Spirit can reach beyond that, deeper and farther.
And again, this is not a rejection of the Jewish history or work. By no means! As Paul would say. It is the progression, just as Moses was a progression from the revelation given to Abraham, and the prophets were continuation of the revelation given to Moses. The Temple, the very marker of God’s favor and the central feature of Torah, was allowed to be destroyed, never to be rebuilt. With an incomplete Law we are not left incomplete, but are made complete instead through the Spirit.
The Church has wrongly said it is wrong to follow Torah. The early Judaizers, as Paul called them, were wrong to say all who followed Yeshua had to follow the whole Torah. We are called as we are called, and we worship God as we are called, led by the Spirit whether by the ancient practices handed down or by new forms of creative inspiration that conform to the full work of the Spirit in our contexts so that whether Jew or Greek, male or female, young or old the name of Yeshua is raised above all.
Aaron said, “Lets just start with the 10 Commandments. They are “laws” are they not? Are they still in play?”
This is a great place to start. And I’m going to be elusive again. Yes and no.
Is is still wrong to murder? Yes. But Yeshua added to this saying:
“You shall not murder ‘; and “whoever murders shall be liable to judgment.’ But I say to you that if you are angry with a brother or sister, you will be liable to judgment; and if you insult a brother or sister, you will be liable to the council; and if you say, “You fool,’ you will be liable to the hell of fire.
So when you are offering your gift at the altar, if you remember that your brother or sister has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother or sister, and then come and offer your gift. 25 Come to terms quickly with your accuser while you are on the way to court with him, or your accuser may hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you will be thrown into prison. Truly I tell you, you will never get out until you have paid the last penny.
Don’t murder, yes. But don’t even be angry. In fact make it your priority over everything else to resolve anger and be in good relationship. Don’t attack a person physically or with words. Don’t kill, don’t even denigrate.
That’s the law and more so, going beyond what seems humanly possible. The Spirit pushes us deeper, farther, more holistic, more flexibly, more situationally. We have to always be on our toes. We can never just sit back. We strive more and more and more. The Ten Commandments are the bedrock. But the law of the Spirit compels us to go beyond, to embrace what is right through a new freedom of relationship. Much as a person who lives in a free country is more compliant than a person who lives under a dictatorship. Not only more compliant but more participatory, going above and beyond in the service of freedom. We take the delight that the psalmist expresses in Psalm 119 and push even farther, expresses a delight in relating to the lawgiver and pleasing him because we love him and are being constantly led by the very Spirit of the Living God who knows even more than the Law ever hinted at.
placed in darkness
David, the king, was a man with blood on his hands. God himself told him that. And he was. The man was thrown into one war after another. Violence followed him all his life.
Yet he was one of the most honored men in the Bible. Even with all his sins he remains one of the key models of serving God. Because he was obedient. Because he loved God with all his being.
Solomon was a man of peace. God gave him no end of wisdom and no end of material blessings. And Solomon wasn’t near the man of God that David was.
It always seems like God should be pushing us to the place of peace and quiet. Only he doesn’t. The Bible is filled with violence, and attacks, and moments in which the person of God is put into a situation where there doesn’t seem to be a ‘holy’ response. Except that God has placed them there and the holy response is not the theologically ideal one but the one that is following God’s obedience.
We can feel so discouraged when in a place absolutely washed over with darkness. But we, and the Spirit in us, are light. There are places where the church has utterly failed to reach anymore, and the church as it is speaks hardly anything into lives of desperation and loss and frustration and despair. The American church is very good about ministering to the middle class.
But God still works among all people. He calls and he places people to be lights, often because of their own humility, and he uses them. Even if sometimes in the course of being there they might be asked to let go some of the ideal, that’s not separating them from God. Sometimes people choose to go to such places and among such people voluntarily. But the most effective are those who are among. Who have lost, and suffered, and pined, and despaired, and endured frustration and pain. These are the people who know, and from that knowing can speak the words of God to those who desperately need good news.
We can be a light in the midst of the darkness. Like King David. We feel the darkness and see it every day. We sometimes feel in the depth of our being why people don’t minister in the hidden places, why they don’t linger, why they give up, and why they say, “someone else.” We feel the conflict. But that very conflict and darkness is why God does place people, in the circumstances they are in, to be in places like that. It’s not the well that need a doctor, though most of the church are like Beverly Hills plastic surgeons–doing cosmetic work on the already well-blessed. It can be a special work of God to be in the darkness, among the sick, besides the lost.
It is where we are placed, sometimes in the place of our own darkness, where we are being obedient. And that is the trait that brought David so much blessing and so much of a close relationship with God. Joseph was thrown into prison for doing what was right. And while in prison he became a leader. The boy who had so many great dreams was cast into the dungeon. He lost his dreams and then began interpreting the dreams of others as he stayed with God, eventually rising out of prison with God to save Egypt and Israel from famine.
a wee prayer request
So a curious thing happened in 2007. I ended 2006 rather burned out. I had a book written, but no word on if it was going to be published. I felt a bit brain dead, isolated, and otherwise unfocused. I felt stuck and I felt I needed to push. Potential ministry possibilities were staying flat and quiet. I couldn’t seem to get any connections to spark or any directions to open up. So I started looking in to PhD programs. In history. The process for this required me to get in touch with old professors. And getting in touch with one old professor sparked my taking a couple of classes early in 2007. I get two free audits a year as part of my Fuller Seminary Alumni Rewards program so I took a class on Pursuit of Wholeness (mostly uninspiring and tending towards psychobabble) and I sat in on a class on Jurgen Moltmann’s theology. It was a PhD class. After a presentation I did on the Coming of God, the professor heartily encouraged me to to pursue a PhD under his guidance.
While this had been in the back of my head I had basically pushed it aside after graduating with my M.Div in late 2002. Ministry is what did it to me. I loved working with people, disciplining, wrestling with real life situations and approaches. When I had entered seminary in 1999 I didn’t know which path aI wanted to take, and went through three years setting myself up for either ministry or academics. By the year after I had finished I was burned out with both. Not because of a lack of interest or passion in the subjects. Because of the politics that seemed to be much more influential in both directions. I’m bad at politicking. I’m bad at saying what should be said as opposed to what I think. I keep opening my mouth at the wrong times, or not networking as I should.
This pushed me into other directions, and after seeing there was no life there, I went towards writing. My interests continued towards practical ministry, even as my reading regained an academic influence. Most ministry books bore me, to be honest. While most academic books ignite thoughts of practical application. There’s an engineer in me wanting to come out, I think, and my tools and materials are theological.
No doors opened, or have opened, in ministry directions, other than a wee little curious conversation that’s happening in Pasadena each Sunday at Lucky Baldwins. But a door did open in academics, and as I kept peeking through, the door remained open, with increasing curious encouragement.
So I applied to Fuller, for a PhD in systematic theology, where my dissertation, as recommended by that old professor would focus on emerging church theology and Moltmann’s theology. A curious blend of both academics and practical ministry study under one of the foremost scholars on the Holy Spirit in the world.
Well, in the past I thought I had to choose either/or, but with this it might be a wonderful both/and in what is increasingly, I think, becoming one of the institutional centers of emerging/missional church thought.
I got the application in early this year. Yesterday I filled out all the financial aid applications. It’s the latter that is the bigger thing in my mind. I have utterly no money for more school, and I’m still in debt from past schooling, which while pushing me deeper and farther in study and discipleship and spiritual growth, hasn’t at all pushed me farther in finances or income.
If God wants me to take these next steps, go through this seemingly opened door before me, he has to provide a way. I would have to move back to Pasadena, and that ain’t cheap. And I’d have to pay for all the costs of school and books.
So, if you’re thinking of me when you toss some words God’s way, could you pray that he opens the door for finances to go this direction. If there’s no money I can’t do it. And I can’t get more loans. I’m not so sold on this to mean that I’d be utterly crushed if it didn’t work out, but it would be nice to know that as many prayers as possible are out there for me to be confident that how it works out really is the best.
I’m working on a new book now, and hope to have it done before summer no matter what, but I can’t help think it would give me a bit of a boost to know there’s a new step and stage waiting for me not too long after, and the money enough to do it without more financial angst.
So, if you would, pray for financial aid decisions being made on my behalf during this next month. That or encourage everyone you know to buy 5 or maybe even 6 hundred copies of my book.
I’ll keep updating on this as I hear news.
emerging conclusion
“Life in the Spirit is a life in the ‘broad place where there is no cramping’ (Job 36:16). So in the new life we experience the Spirit as a ‘broad place’—as the free space for our freedom, as the living space for our lives, as the horizon inviting us to discover life.” Yet, in the history of the church there have been again and again restrictions placed upon this ‘broad place’ some for reasons that make sense in attempts to deter heresy, other times for reasons that can only be characterized as anti-Christ as they assert personal or corporate power for reasons of individual gain. Most often, and consistently through the last two thousand years, the restricted place of the church has not been due to some kind of intentional nefarious rejection of God, but rather due to uncritical assumptions of the broader culture in each era, leading to wholly non-Spiritual boundaries. Churches in which racism or sexism dominate are restricted places. Churches in which the rich dominate poor, or the powerful dominate the powerless are restricted places. Restricted not for those who are the aggrieved, restricted for the aggressors and for the whole society, unable to take up the whole work of the Spirit because of these inherent, societal, restrictions.
As Moltmann writes “‘The broad place’ is the most hidden and silent presence of God’s Spirit in us and round about us. But how else could ‘life in the Spirit’ be understood, if the Spirit were not the space ‘in’ which this life can grow and unfurl.” The dismantling of institutional racism, the new emphasis on equality between men and women, the growing awareness of first world responsibility to the third world, and the increasing concern for the environment have all broken the bonds of restriction that have silently fought against the constant mission of the Spirit. So it is no surprise that now, in this era of new openness, we can see new movements that in their freedom reflect the freedom that is God’s kingdom, movements that echo in practice what Moltmann emphasizes as traits of the broad place of the Spirit. “We explore the depths of this space through the trust of the heart. We search out the length of this space through the extravagant hope. We discover the breadth of this place through the torrents of love which we receive and give.” Only those contexts which freely open themselves to this continual discovery can expect to learn and to express a holistic pneumatology.
This is not a new reality of the Spirit or a new movement of the Spirit but is, in essence, the heart of what was spoken of by the Prophets and then experienced in the early church beginning on Pentecost. In this way, we could call the movement described by Gibbs and Bolger not only the emerging church, but indeed a form of neo-Pentecostalism in which a holistic pneumatology is embraced through a new, liberating freedom for living. “God’s Spirit encompasses us from all sides and wherever we are (Ps. 139). Christ’s Spirit is our immanent power to live—God’s Spirit is our transcendent power for living.” In embracing this reality in full, individually and communally, in unity and in diversity, the church emerges into the comprehensive vision of the kingdom of God.
Thus I concluded my paper on Moltmann and the Emerging Church.
It’s a Dance! Moving with the Holy Spirit
It’s a Dance: Moving with the Holy Spirit is out.
Buy your copy of It’s a Dance: Moving with the Holy Spirit
today!
For more information wander over to the official It’s a Dance Website. There you’ll find the official It’s a Dance blog, Perichoresis, where the conversation continues. Also check out the soon to be updated books and sundries blog, Book Trails, where I’ll be highlighting books, movies, and whatever else that fits in with the Holy Spirit theme.